Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 engine produces 11 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 16.0 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |