Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 engine produces 3 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998, but torque is 5 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 13.1 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |