Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 12 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 808 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |