Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 190 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 978 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 365 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |