Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 53 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 137 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.1 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 978 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1700 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 563 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 209 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |