Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Jeep Wrangler 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 41 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Wrangler might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Wrangler are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2322 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.25 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.05 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |