Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 engine produces 68 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, whereas torque is 137 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |