Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Porsche Cayenne 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 32 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 200 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 13.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1770 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 438 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |