Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Porsche Cayenne 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 22 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1770 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 438 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |