Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 44 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 107 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pathfinder gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 463 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 182 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`793 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |