Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 6 HP less power than Mercedes ML, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine Mercedes ML 2008 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 427 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The Mercedes ML may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |