Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |