Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |