Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee and Jeep Commander have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1940 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 766 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
| |