Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 55 HP more power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 165 NM more than Hyundai Terracan. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai Terracan, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 192 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 46 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |