Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 vs Audi Q7 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 6.4 Petrol | 5.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 468 HP | 500 HP | |
Torque: | 630 NM | 1000 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 32 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 370 NM less than Audi Q7. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 11.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 14.5 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi Q7 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 5.06 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 994 litres | 775 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 2035 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 219 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q7. The Audi Q7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 481 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`475 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 10 600 | 15 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |