Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 352 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 520 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 engine produces 26 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 15.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 620 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 217 mm (8.5 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 has 521 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 (by 355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |