Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 352 HP | 388 HP | |
| Torque: | 520 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 36 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 12.8 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 217 mm (8.5 inches) | 500 mm (19.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mercedes ML can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 496 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 2`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`307 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 642 kg | 720 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |