Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 engine produces 85 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 13.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 has 521 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 (by 355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |