Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 14 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 3 NM less than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.5 l/100km | 13.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 450'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 94 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |