Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 6 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 13 NM less than Audi Q7. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.1 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 2035 litres | |
|
Audi Q7 has more luggage space. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 318 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 481 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`948 | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |