Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Audi Q5 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 270 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 16 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.5 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 3.6 engine Audi Q5 2009 3.2 engine: This engine continues to suffer from a range of reliability concerns, many of which stem from cost-cutting on materials. One recurring issue involves low-grade gaskets used in critical areas like valve covers, ... More about Audi Q5 2009 3.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 19 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 457 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 6 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`948 kg | 2`415 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`114 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 834 kg | 610 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Audi Q5. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |