Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC90) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 230 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 180 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |