Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 241 HP | 185 HP | |
Torque: | 550 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 56 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1290 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
900 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 780 litres | 613 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1837 litres | |
In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 167 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |