Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 engine produces 23 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 has 198 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 (by 355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |