Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 19 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, but torque is 200 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.6 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 545 litres more trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. The Subaru B9 Tribeca may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |