Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 51 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee and Nissan Pathfinder are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 590 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 537 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |