Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs Land Rover Discovery 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 256 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 15 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |