Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 241 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 10 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X5, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 160 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
BMW X5 has
| |