Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.4 Petrol | 6.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 468 HP | 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 624 NM | 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 and Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 have the same engine power, but Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 torque is 6 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 14.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.5 l/100km | 14.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 94 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 994 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 has 212 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2011. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |