Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 and Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 16.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 4.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 and Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 has 325 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`812 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |