Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 347 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 20 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 240 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLS, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 2010 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 92 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`812 kg | 2`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`121 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 691 kg | 770 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |