Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 47 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 782 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 182 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 283 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |