Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 241 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 engine produces 6 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 and Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 2`949 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`393 kg | 2`272 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 556 kg | 677 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |