Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 70 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 161 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 50 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
| |