Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Porsche Cayenne) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 86 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 130 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 3.4 | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 2350 km in combined cycle | |
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1690 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 202 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 136 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |