Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 247 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 570 NM | 550 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 7 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1360 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
1020 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 1 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.83 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 670 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | 1780 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 112 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Cayenne (by 226 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`860 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 24 000 | 19 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |