Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Despite the higher power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 112 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. The Porsche Cayenne may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 27 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |