Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan Murano 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Murano is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 2 HP less power than Nissan Murano, but torque is 236 NM more than Nissan Murano. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 10.6 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |