Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan Murano 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 57 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 380 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The Nissan Murano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Murano. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |