Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 43 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes ML 2011 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 2010 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 92 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`393 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 556 kg | 800 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |