Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 53 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 1731 litres | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 109 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 2`610 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`393 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 556 kg | 651 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |