Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 263 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 16.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 795 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 7.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 1040 km with real consumption | 470 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has 2 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 39 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |