Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 50 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.67 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1554 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 109 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`949 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 50 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |