Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 8 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.3 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`328 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 621 kg | 885 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 43 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |