Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 56 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 206 mm (8.1 inches) | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 782 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 782 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1554 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 2 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`949 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`328 kg | 2`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 621 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 65 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 47 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |