Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 384 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Jeep Grand Cherokee torque is 44 NM more than Honda CR-V. Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 6.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 579 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`375 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |