Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.1 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 384 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 23 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 41 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 9.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`375 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |