Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 198 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 13.5 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 29 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`336 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |