Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 198 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 engine produces 3 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, but torque is 5 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 13.2 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`336 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998 has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |